Are Law Firms Struggling with Hybrid Work—Or Just Struggling to Manage It?

For many firms, the shift to hybrid and distributed work environments was a necessary response to the pandemic. But now, five years on, one question lingers: Are hybrid teams failing, or have law firms failed to figure out how to manage them? The push to bring teams back into the office suggests the latter.

Historically, law firm managers had an advantage. A simple walk across the office was enough to gauge team morale, check in on workload balance, or catch early signs of burnout. These informal interactions made managing teams feel intuitive. But with hybrid work, these micro-moments are gone.

In their place? A maze of asynchronous messages, missed MS Teams notifications, and delayed email responses. Suddenly, what was once a five-second check-in has become a scheduled meeting, an added step, a bottleneck.

What’s really driving the disconnect?

The shift to hybrid work hasn’t just changed where people work—it’s changed how managers need to work. And for many law firm leaders, this adjustment hasn’t come easily.

1. The Loss of Informal Interactions

In-office, a two-minute desk visit provided immediate insights into who was swamped and who had capacity. Without those casual interactions, managers struggle to assess workload balance in real-time.

2. Delayed communication and bottlenecks

Hybrid work introduces friction into decision-making. Associates wait for responses, emails linger unread, and minor issues balloon into major delays.

3. The visibility gap

Before hybrid work, productivity was often measured by presence. If an associate was at their desk, they were assumed to be working. But with hybrid teams, managers lack real-time visibility into who is overloaded and who has bandwidth.

4. Employee well-being risks

Without face-to-face interactions, warning signs of burnout are harder to spot. Junior associates may hesitate to speak up about heavy workloads, and by the time issues surface, they’re often at a crisis point.

5. The technology mismatch

Most law firms still rely on a patchwork of outdated tools—email, spreadsheets, and top down project management tools—to track work. But these tools weren’t built for hybrid teams. They don’t offer integrated, real-time insights into team capacity, making it harder to manage effectively.

Is the solution more office time—or smarter management?

Faced with these challenges, some firms have drawn a simple conclusion: Hybrid work isn’t working, so let’s bring people back to the office. But that response ignores the real issue.

Hybrid teams can work—if they’re managed differently. The challenge isn’t the model; it’s the lack of a management framework that fits the reality of how hybrid teams operate.

Belt, a Natural Work Management application, is tackling this exact problem. Unlike traditional project management tools that force teams into rigid workflows, Belt aligns with how work naturally happens—across emails, chat tools, and document collaboration platforms.

By giving COOs real-time insights into work progress, team workload, and bottlenecks, applications like Belt help firms bridge the visibility gap. Instead of guessing how associates are doing, managers can see it—without micromanaging or demanding unnecessary office time.

Why this matters for law firms

Large firms may have the resources to implement complex tracking and management systems, but smaller law firms—typically operating with 30-100 users—don’t have that luxury. They need solutions that fit into their existing workflows, not ones that create more administrative burden.

For smaller law firm COOs and Partners, the priority isn’t forcing associates back into the office—it’s finding a way to:

  • Understand what teams are working on, without disrupting them.
  • Identify potential workload imbalances before they become burnout crises.
  • Improve communication without adding unnecessary meetings or check-ins.
  • Give associates flexibility without sacrificing oversight.

The future: managing smarter, not harder

The hybrid work debate has been framed as an all-or-nothing decision: full remote vs. full in-office. But that’s a false choice. The real issue is that many firms haven’t adapted their management approach to fit the way work actually happens now.

COOs who want to succeed in this new environment need to stop asking, “How do we get people back in the office?” and start asking, “How do we manage hybrid teams effectively?” The firms that answer that question first won’t just survive the hybrid shift—they’ll thrive in it.

For firms still struggling with hybrid work, the issue isn’t where people are sitting. It’s whether you truly understand what they’re doing.

Related blog posts

Are Law Firms Struggling with Hybrid Work—Or Just Struggling to Manage It?

For many firms, the shift to hybrid and distributed work environments was a nece...

Melody Easton, February 2025

Understanding How People Really Work

Hybrid work changed not just where we work but how we manage work. The old tools...

Melody Easton, January 2025